03-22-2006, 10:30 PM
03-22-2006, 10:38 PM
the r/t for the WWIII come down to the best r/t i a certain range, at least that is my experiecne, if this will make sence, you are r/t is too fast to have the time, it needed to be in a certain range and racerchick got it
03-22-2006, 10:46 PM
THE_ONE Wrote:the r/t for the WWIII come down to the best r/t i a certain range, at least that is my experiecne, if this will make sence, you are r/t is too fast to have the time, it needed to be in a certain range and racerchick got it
That makes no sense at all...
03-23-2006, 12:14 AM
seriously no bullshit
it really doesnt
i dont understand what the one said
but i get what rach is saying
they got number 1 on the top spot
but ur r/t is faster thus really making u the 1320 faster
it really doesnt
i dont understand what the one said
but i get what rach is saying
they got number 1 on the top spot
but ur r/t is faster thus really making u the 1320 faster
03-23-2006, 12:23 AM
Yah, the WWWII is confusing...
Look:
Top Imports
Driver Name Vehicle Date Timeslip
r_o_m_3_o_ Honda S2000 (AP1) 03/17, 12:33AM [email protected]
THE_p00nMan Honda S2000 (AP1) 03/20, 08:54AM [email protected]
Top Euros
Driver Name Vehicle Date Timeslip
RaceChick_____Xx Range Rover Range Stormer (Concept) 03/21, 06:48PM [email protected]
BRETT__FAVRE Range Rover Range Stormer (Concept) 03/18, 10:52AM [email protected]
weasal Range Rover Range Stormer (Concept) 03/22, 02:22PM [email protected]
Hmmmm, [email protected] beats [email protected] (makes sense)
But [email protected] beats 7.965@ 169.87 (makes no sense...)
Doesn't the faster mph get the top place? It's like having 2 cars that make the same 1/4 mile, but one has a faster mph, so doesn't the faster mph win?... plz explain again Tyler b/c I didn't understand you either... =S
Look:
Top Imports
Driver Name Vehicle Date Timeslip
r_o_m_3_o_ Honda S2000 (AP1) 03/17, 12:33AM [email protected]
THE_p00nMan Honda S2000 (AP1) 03/20, 08:54AM [email protected]
Top Euros
Driver Name Vehicle Date Timeslip
RaceChick_____Xx Range Rover Range Stormer (Concept) 03/21, 06:48PM [email protected]
BRETT__FAVRE Range Rover Range Stormer (Concept) 03/18, 10:52AM [email protected]
weasal Range Rover Range Stormer (Concept) 03/22, 02:22PM [email protected]
Hmmmm, [email protected] beats [email protected] (makes sense)
But [email protected] beats 7.965@ 169.87 (makes no sense...)
Doesn't the faster mph get the top place? It's like having 2 cars that make the same 1/4 mile, but one has a faster mph, so doesn't the faster mph win?... plz explain again Tyler b/c I didn't understand you either... =S
03-23-2006, 12:57 AM
this is why everyone ending up on the same level is pointless, and dumb.
03-23-2006, 01:05 AM
ya..they need to change the exp system
03-23-2006, 04:52 AM
Please someone explain this to me in words that make sense...PLEASE!!!!!!!!!
03-23-2006, 04:54 AM
OneHotBitch Wrote:Please someone explain this to me in words that make sense...PLEASE!!!!!!!!!
dis game b fukked up? :lol:
<3 rach
03-23-2006, 06:07 AM
Your r/t is actually to fast, for the time your car ran in the quarter mile..
According to the game.
It expects your R/t to be slower for that 1/4 mile..
Thus, the person with the r/t closer to what the game expects, is who wins..
Easier to understand maybe?
According to the game.
It expects your R/t to be slower for that 1/4 mile..
Thus, the person with the r/t closer to what the game expects, is who wins..
Easier to understand maybe?