+- Midnite Challenge Forums (http://www.midnitechallenge.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Midnite Challenge (http://www.midnitechallenge.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Forum: General Game Discussion (http://www.midnitechallenge.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Thread: Can someone please explain my 2nd place in WWIII?????????? (/showthread.php?tid=2853)
Can someone please explain my 2nd place in WWIII?????????? - R_Y_A_N - 03-23-2006
OneHotBitch Wrote:skogey10 Wrote:Good question Rachael, here is the answer 100% correctly.
It is like that because it was not changed like Ray told me it would be BEFORE I set the WWIII times AND after a couple months ago.
http://www.midnitechallenge.com/images/winners/ww3-0106.jpg
Have a look at that, now I had screenshots of both the Euro and Domestics clearly showing that I won on RT and mph, but Zura still won it even though it is 150% INCORRECT. This is the primary reason I don't play anymore, it doesn't make ANY sense at all and I was told that RT and ET are more important than mph UNLESS there is a tie. There was no tie for me, I had obviously won, just like you should now. How did you not get first? YOU SHOULD HAVE AND SO SHOULD I!
Jered, thanks for writing that all out. It's nice to know that I am right an should have first place...and that you (a person whose game and opinion I actually respect) agree with me 100%.
Well my RT is higher...and my ET is faster...not to mention that my MPH is also faster...so I cannot fathom why I am in second place.
I wish Raymond or someone with some pull around here would see this and respond. It's obviously some sort of glitch and I feel it should be fixed...no?
Yes????
Can someone please explain my 2nd place in WWIII?????????? - THE_ONE - 03-23-2006
i agree and ray has been informed a couple times about it from many people
Can someone please explain my 2nd place in WWIII?????????? - calder12 - 03-23-2006
TS shootouts are like this too, I have seen on many occasions someone with a faster overall time not win =/ It sucks to be honest.
Can someone please explain my 2nd place in WWIII?????????? - HOMIEPA - 03-23-2006
damn that rele sucks ass......skogey clearly won it.....
i hope ray fixes this but if others had told him it my be a lost cause
Can someone please explain my 2nd place in WWIII?????????? - imported_admin - 03-23-2006
To end all the bickering, WW3, Shootouts, etc *DO NOT* take reaction time into consideration when ranking you in the top 10.
With that said, in the world of drag racing, cars can run the same ET, and yet have very different MPH - depending on the vehicle and its individual setup.
Thus, RaceChick is currently tied with Brett_favre in ET since "Fastest Euro" means just that - whoever has the FASTEST european car independant of the driver.
I have updated how the ranking is listed for ties - whoever sets the time first will be ranked higher than anyone who ties their original ET.
Can someone please explain my 2nd place in WWIII?????????? - HOMIEPA - 03-23-2006
oh man i never knew that im takin IDE now.....well in a few sessions....
thanks for the info
Can someone please explain my 2nd place in WWIII?????????? - eRazorzEDGE - 03-23-2006
SWEEEEEETTT!!
aiight tyler..... it's a race 4 lvl 35 next round??? i think i can do it n 3 days
Can someone please explain my 2nd place in WWIII?????????? - eRazorzEDGE - 03-23-2006
oh yeah, dbl post, sorry, but wtf is up with my time vs. rom3o's time?
Top Imports
Driver Name Vehicle Date Timeslip
r_o_m_3_o_ Honda S2000 (AP1) 03/17, 12:33AM 8.116@166.71
THE_p00nMan Honda S2000 (AP1) 03/20, 08:54AM 8.116@166.72
and i wasn't n 2nd place b4 yesterday, either..... i was 4th down the list tied 4 1st :?
and if it's a tie, then doesn't that mean we all get an IDE medal??
Can someone please explain my 2nd place in WWIII?????????? - imported_admin - 03-23-2006
eRazorzEDGE Wrote:oh yeah, dbl post, sorry, but wtf is up with my time vs. rom3o's time?
Top Imports
Driver Name Vehicle Date Timeslip
r_o_m_3_o_ Honda S2000 (AP1) 03/17, 12:33AM 8.116@166.71
THE_p00nMan Honda S2000 (AP1) 03/20, 08:54AM 8.116@166.72
and i wasn't n 2nd place b4 yesterday, either..... i was 4th down the list tied 4 1st :?
and if it's a tie, then doesn't that mean we all get an IDE medal??
I will say this one more time... Your ranking is based on your ET only! You and rom3o are TIED at 8.116sec
Your MPH is irrelevant (read my previous post). He posted 8.116s FIRST thus he is ranked above you.
And no, if there is a tie, whoever posted the time first gets the medal.
Can someone please explain my 2nd place in WWIII?????????? - THE_ONE - 03-23-2006
well actually i am sorry to say this but racheal posted the best time first so why is she behind racerchick for E?