+- Midnite Challenge Forums (http://www.midnitechallenge.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Midnite Challenge (http://www.midnitechallenge.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Forum: General Game Discussion (http://www.midnitechallenge.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Thread: Can someone please explain my 2nd place in WWIII?????????? (/showthread.php?tid=2853)
Can someone please explain my 2nd place in WWIII?????????? - OneHotBitch - 03-22-2006
Take a look at Euro WWIII times. My RT is quicker, my MPH is faster and the times are the same...
Am I missing something?
Can someone please explain my 2nd place in WWIII?????????? - THE_ONE - 03-22-2006
the r/t for the WWIII come down to the best r/t i a certain range, at least that is my experiecne, if this will make sence, you are r/t is too fast to have the time, it needed to be in a certain range and racerchick got it
Can someone please explain my 2nd place in WWIII?????????? - OneHotBitch - 03-22-2006
THE_ONE Wrote:the r/t for the WWIII come down to the best r/t i a certain range, at least that is my experiecne, if this will make sence, you are r/t is too fast to have the time, it needed to be in a certain range and racerchick got it
That makes no sense at all...
Can someone please explain my 2nd place in WWIII?????????? - rhs - 03-23-2006
seriously no bullshit
it really doesnt
i dont understand what the one said
but i get what rach is saying
they got number 1 on the top spot
but ur r/t is faster thus really making u the 1320 faster
Can someone please explain my 2nd place in WWIII?????????? - burn_u_out - 03-23-2006
Yah, the WWWII is confusing...
Look:
Top Imports
Driver Name Vehicle Date Timeslip
r_o_m_3_o_ Honda S2000 (AP1) 03/17, 12:33AM 8.116@166.71
THE_p00nMan Honda S2000 (AP1) 03/20, 08:54AM 8.116@166.72
Top Euros
Driver Name Vehicle Date Timeslip
RaceChick_____Xx Range Rover Range Stormer (Concept) 03/21, 06:48PM 7.965@169.86
BRETT__FAVRE Range Rover Range Stormer (Concept) 03/18, 10:52AM 7.965@169.87
weasal Range Rover Range Stormer (Concept) 03/22, 02:22PM 7.966@169.85
Hmmmm, 7.965@169.87 beats 7.966@169.85 (makes sense)
But 7.965@169.86 beats 7.965@ 169.87 (makes no sense...)
Doesn't the faster mph get the top place? It's like having 2 cars that make the same 1/4 mile, but one has a faster mph, so doesn't the faster mph win?... plz explain again Tyler b/c I didn't understand you either... =S
Can someone please explain my 2nd place in WWIII?????????? - shmedvig - 03-23-2006
this is why everyone ending up on the same level is pointless, and dumb.
Can someone please explain my 2nd place in WWIII?????????? - LuDe - 03-23-2006
ya..they need to change the exp system
Can someone please explain my 2nd place in WWIII?????????? - OneHotBitch - 03-23-2006
Please someone explain this to me in words that make sense...PLEASE!!!!!!!!!
Can someone please explain my 2nd place in WWIII?????????? - BlackWidow⢠- 03-23-2006
OneHotBitch Wrote:Please someone explain this to me in words that make sense...PLEASE!!!!!!!!!
dis game b fukked up? :lol:
<3 rach
Can someone please explain my 2nd place in WWIII?????????? - HoRiZon__ - 03-23-2006
Your r/t is actually to fast, for the time your car ran in the quarter mile..
According to the game.
It expects your R/t to be slower for that 1/4 mile..
Thus, the person with the r/t closer to what the game expects, is who wins..
Easier to understand maybe?